a & s staff enrichment award
a & s staff network
staff news
by-laws
board members
assn handbook
newsletter
assn events
staff awards
mu links
   

STAFF ENRICHMENT AWARD

   

 

 

OPEN NOMINATION
Applications can be submitted anytime during the year.
This award is funded by the Arts & Science Dean's Office

The Arts & Science Staff Network created the A&S Staff Enrichment Award in order to help develop nonacademic staff as a human resource and foster continued education and professional development.  The award is intended to support participation in short courses, workshops, conferences, and similar short-term experiences.  Applicants should complete all parts of this form, following the guidelines described below.

APPLICATION PROCESS
Completed application and budget should be sent to the A&S Staff Enrichment Award Committee, c/o Patty Eggleston, 101 Read Hall.  Applications will be forwarded to the committee for review according to the posted criteria.  All applicants will be notified of award status in a timely manner.  Award recipients will be instructed where to submit their expense documents and should expect to include a written report of their activities within 30 days of the event.

REQUIREMENTS
Applicants must be a full-time (at least 75% FTE), permanent nonacademic staff of the College of Arts and Science who have completed six months of continuous employment with MU.  Current A&S Staff Network members are ineligible.  Reimbursement will be in accordance with University regulations and consistent with the budget approved by the A&S Staff Enrichment Award Committee.  Individual awards will not exceed $150.00 in any given fiscal year; exceptions require special approval and are dependent upon available funds.  Once reimbursement is made, there is a 3-year waiting period before a new application can be submitted.

EXCLUSIONS

  • Certification exams
  • MU Educational Assistance (courses toward degrees)
  • Adult Education Courses
  • Duplicate awards (i.e., the campus-wide Staff Development Project Award Program) 

REVIEWING CRITERIA

  • Overall Quality: Clear, coherent, specific? Acronyms spelled out? Professional or personal benefit? Benefit to others?
  • Feasibility: Activity completed within stated dates? Benefits consistent with stated purpose?
  • Conformity to Requirements: Applicant eligible? Activity eligible? Supervisor's signature obtained?
  • Budget Feasibility: Conforms to the MU regulations? Reasonable and justified?
 
updated: October 4, 2007 10:54 AM
   
 
   
 
Network web page maintained by Josh Hartley